In the rapidly evolving cannabis industry, navigating the complexities of business and real estate transactions requires meticulous attention to detail. Letters of Intent (LOI) and Purchase and Sales Agreements (PSA) serve as foundational documents that outline the terms of a deal, but many buyers and sellers overlook cannabis-specific clauses that can make or break a transaction. These oversights often stem from the unique regulatory landscape, where federal illegality intersects with state-level approvals, zoning requirements, and operational nuances like C1D1 extraction rooms or Conditional Use Permits (CUP). Whether you’re acquiring a cultivation facility or a dispensary operation, understanding these clauses is crucial to avoiding costly pitfalls.
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, engineering, financial, or tax advice. Always consult qualified professionals and your local Authority Having Jurisdiction before making decisions.
If you’re ready to explore opportunities in this space, browse our cannabis businesses for sale to find turnkey operations or expansion prospects that align with your goals:
https://www.420property.com/listings/business-for-sale/
The Role of Letters of Intent in Cannabis Deals
A Letter of Intent (LOI) is typically the first formal step in a cannabis transaction, acting as a non-binding roadmap that captures the high-level agreement between parties. In standard business deals, an LOI might focus on purchase price, phrase terms, and timelines. However, in the cannabis sector, it must address industry-specific risks from the outset. Parties often circulate an LOI early when dialing in big-picture terms, such as whether the deal involves an asset purchase agreement (APA) or stock sale, and how to handle Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE) or Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) in valuations.
One common mistake is treating the LOI as entirely non-binding. While the core terms like price may be subject to due diligence, sections on confidentiality and exclusivity are often enforceable. In cannabis, where market volatility and regulatory scrutiny are high, an exclusivity clause prevents the seller from shopping the deal elsewhere during negotiations, giving the buyer time to assess zoning compliance or CUP status. Neglecting to include or enforce these can lead to lost opportunities or leaked sensitive information about operations.
Moreover, cannabis LOIs should incorporate contingencies for regulatory approvals. For instance, many states require pre-approval for license transfers, which can take months. A well-drafted LOI might stipulate that the deal proceeds only upon confirmation from the state cannabis authority, protecting both sides from proceeding with an unviable transaction. Buyers often neglect to tie deposits or earnest money to these approvals, risking non-refundable funds if the deal falls through due to denied permissions.
Cannabis-Specific Clauses in Letters of Intent and Purchase and Sales Agreements That Are Often Overlooked
When transitioning from an LOI to a PSA, the stakes intensify. The PSA is the binding contract that details the sale’s mechanics, including representations, warranties, and closing conditions. In cannabis transactions, certain clauses are essential to mitigate risks tied to the industry’s federal-state divide, yet they are frequently neglected, leading to disputes or unenforceable agreements.
Regulatory Compliance and License Transfer Provisions
At the heart of any cannabis PSA are clauses ensuring compliance with state and local laws. These should include representations and warranties that the business holds valid licenses, permits, and CUPs, and that no violations exist. Buyers often neglect to verify the transferability of licenses—many states prohibit outright transfers, requiring new applications instead. A neglected clause here might be a “management services agreement” interim provision, allowing the buyer to operate under the seller’s license during the approval process while pulling revenue through fees.
Sellers, on the other hand, might overlook indemnification clauses that hold them liable for pre-closing regulatory issues, such as unpaid taxes under IRS Section 280E, which disallows deductions for cannabis businesses. Including a Quality of Earnings (QoE) analysis in the PSA can reveal hidden liabilities, but it’s often skipped in rushed deals.
For real estate-heavy transactions, zoning clauses are critical. A PSA should specify that the property meets cannabis zoning requirements, including setbacks from schools or churches. Neglecting a contingency for municipal approval can leave buyers with a property zoned incorrectly, rendering it useless for cultivation or retail. In states like California, where licenses are tied to specific locations, this oversight can derail the entire deal.
Phases of Cannabis License Transfers
Understanding the phases of license transfers is vital, as these processes vary by state but generally follow a structured timeline that should be reflected in both LOIs and PSAs. The initial phase often involves pre-application preparation, where parties assess transfer eligibility—such as confirming the license type (e.g., cultivation, dispensary) and gathering required documentation like financial statements or proof of compliance. In states like New Jersey, conditional applications can take 7 to 12 weeks, while full annual conversions extend to 15 to 28 weeks.
The submission phase requires filing with the state regulatory body, such as Oklahoma’s Medical Marijuana Authority or California’s Department of Cannabis Control via their online portals. This includes logging into licensing systems, selecting the license for transfer, and paying fees, which can range from $1,000 to $5,000 depending on the jurisdiction. Clauses in the PSA should allocate responsibility for these costs and include timelines tied to submission deadlines to prevent delays.
Following submission, the review and approval phase entails regulatory scrutiny, including background checks, site inspections, and verification of no outstanding violations. For instance, in Minnesota, step-by-step instructions guide applicants through portal registration and material submission, with approvals potentially hinging on local authorizations. Neglecting to include contingencies for this phase in the LOI can lead to extended exclusivity periods without progress.
The final post-approval phase involves completing the transfer, such as updating records, paying any remaining fees, and ensuring operational handover. In Colorado cities like Boulder, this requires specific forms for medical and recreational transfers. PSAs should incorporate holdback provisions or escrows to cover potential denials or appeals, ensuring the deal closes only after full transfer confirmation. Overlooking these phased contingencies can expose buyers to operating without proper licensure, risking fines or shutdowns.
Illegality Defense Waivers and Severability Clauses
Given cannabis’s federal Schedule I status, contracts risk being deemed unenforceable in federal courts. A waiver of illegality defense clause requires both parties to agree not to challenge the contract’s validity based on federal law, strengthening its standing in state courts. This is often neglected by sellers who assume state legality suffices, but it provides crucial protection in disputes.
Paired with this is a severability clause, ensuring that if one provision (e.g., a license transfer) is invalidated, the rest of the PSA remains intact. In cannabis deals, where regulations evolve rapidly, this prevents the entire agreement from collapsing due to a single non-compliant term.
Environmental and Hazardous Materials Contingencies
Cannabis operations, especially extraction facilities, involve hazardous materials requiring C1D1-compliant spaces for volatile solvents. PSAs should include environmental due diligence contingencies, such as Phase I and Phase II assessments, to uncover soil contamination or improper waste disposal. Buyers often neglect these, assuming the property’s history is clean, but legacy issues from prior uses can lead to cleanup costs exceeding the purchase price.
A related clause is for Tenant Improvements (TI), specifying who funds modifications like HVAC upgrades for odor control or security enhancements mandated by state rules. Without clear TI provisions, disputes arise post-closing, eroding deal value.
Financial and Debt-Related Clauses
Financial scrutiny is paramount in cannabis, where traditional banking is limited. Include clauses requiring disclosure of all debts, including Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) for any financed portions. Neglected often is a QoE review clause, which adjusts the purchase price based on verified earnings, preventing overpayment for inflated SDE or EBITDA figures.
In LOIs, a “subject to adjustment” clause for the purchase price allows flexibility after due diligence reveals issues like undisclosed liens. Sellers might overlook escrow holdbacks for potential tax liabilities, leaving them exposed.
Past Debts and Obligations Clauses
A critical yet often neglected area involves clauses addressing past debts and obligations, which can include accrued liabilities like unpaid vendor bills, tax arrears under Section 280E, or employee severance. In asset purchase agreements (APAs), buyers typically assume only specified “Assumed Liabilities,” such as ongoing contracts, while the seller retains responsibility for pre-closing debts. Representations and warranties should mandate full disclosure of all known and contingent obligations, with indemnification clauses holding the seller accountable for any undisclosed items that surface post-closing.
For instance, clauses may require the seller to satisfy certain debts at closing, such as sales tax obligations or lender payoffs, using proceeds from the sale. In cases of distressed sales, provisions for bankruptcy-like protections or creditor consents are essential, as cannabis companies may face restrictions on federal bankruptcy filings. Due diligence contingencies in the PSA should allow for thorough reviews of financials to uncover hidden debts, with adjustments to the purchase price or holdbacks in escrow (e.g., 10–20% of the price held for 6–12 months) to cover potential claims.
Neglecting these can lead to buyers inheriting liabilities that erode the deal’s value, such as lawsuits from creditors or regulatory penalties for unresolved violations. Sellers should negotiate caps on indemnification to limit exposure, balancing protection with deal feasibility.
Intellectual Property and Operational Transfer Clauses
Cannabis brands rely on trademarks, strains, and recipes, yet IP transfer clauses are frequently under-detailed. A PSA should include an IP license agreement or assignment, ensuring the buyer acquires rights to proprietary genetics or branding. Neglecting this can result in the seller retaining valuable assets, diminishing the business’s worth.
Operational clauses, like assignment of contracts (e.g., supplier agreements), are vital. In cannabis, these must comply Hein with state rules on third-party consents, often overlooked in APAs where assets are cherry-picked.
Common Pitfalls in Due Diligence and How Clauses Mitigate Them
Due diligence bridges the LOI and PSA, yet many neglect its depth in cannabis deals. Key areas include corporate authority—ensuring all owners approve the sale—and real property leases, which must allow cannabis use without landlord veto.
A strong PSA incorporates due diligence contingencies, allowing buyers to exit if red flags emerge, such as non-compliant zoning or pending enforcement actions. For instance, a 60-day due diligence period with access to records can uncover hidden financial liabilities, but without specific clauses mandating full disclosure, sellers might withhold critical info.
In real estate PSAs, title work contingencies are essential to address easements or restrictions. Cannabis-friendly title insurance is rare, so clauses requiring seller cures for defects prevent surprises.
Best Practices for Drafting and Negotiating These Documents
To avoid neglecting cannabis-specific clauses, start with a tailored LOI that outlines regulatory paths. Engage experts early to model scenarios, incorporating force majeure for supply chain disruptions unique to cannabis, like crop failures or policy shifts.
In the PSA, use broad indemnification to cover post-closing surprises, and include clawback provisions if approvals fail. Vary timelines based on state—e.g., longer in restrictive markets—to account for delays.
Ultimately, these clauses protect value, ensuring the deal reflects true SDE and EBITDA while complying with zoning and CUP mandates.
Final Thoughts: Secure Your Cannabis Transaction Today
By prioritizing cannabis-specific clauses in your LOI and PSA, you can navigate this high-stakes industry with confidence. Don’t let overlooked provisions derail your investment—proactive drafting pays dividends.
Ready to put this knowledge into action? Explore our real estate listings for sale tailored for cannabis operations, or dive into available cannabis businesses to find your next venture:
https://www.420property.com/listings/real-estate-listings/for-sale/
https://www.420property.com/listings/business-for-sale/
Please visit:
Our Sponsor
